WEST VINCENT TOWNSHIP
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES --
MONDAY, JUNE 4, 2001

 

The administrative meeting of the Board of Supervisors, held in the Township Building was called to order at 8:12 a.m. by Chairman Kenneth Miller; also in attendance were Supervisor Zoë Perkins, Township Manager Allen Heist, Township Solicitor Allan Greenwood, Code Enforcement Officer Robert Wideman, Township Engineer Craig Kologie, and Planning Commission Chairman Jim Wendelgass.

Richard Guarini and Eileen Golden of The Hankin Group, Ted Gacomis and Neal Fisher of E. B. Walsh and Associates, and Elizabeth Witmer, Esquire were present to review the list prepared by the Township Engineer identifying outstanding items required for Weatherstone Preliminary Subdivision Plan approval.

 

Based on Castle Valley’s May 31, 2001 review letter, outstanding items relating to the Conditional Use Order include the following: 

  • Order A.7. pertaining to site access – Applicant’s Engineer is addressing as requested.
  • Order A.12.ii. pertaining to provision of left turn lane for “Access C” – Applicant’s Engineer is addressing as requested.
  • Order A.12.iii., Order A.13. & Order D.30.d.(1) pertaining to Fellowship Road turning restriction – Applicant’s Engineer is addressing as requested.
  • Order A.14. pertaining to pedestrian circulation – Paved trail will be shown through Open Space C; a note will be added stating that the trail location may change slightly following a walk through after lagoon details have been finalized.
  • Order D.29. pertaining to open space management and pocket parks – The Declaration, including land management guidelines, will be submitted.  Detailed plans for the pocket parks will be provided showing a passive use park design for two parks and a typical tot lot design for one park. 
  • Order E.30.a. pertaining to connector road conversion – The Official Map shows the connector road along the property line; the proposed plan shows the road alignment 10’ off the property line eliminating direct access to the Zarichniak property.  The Applicant will review options and submit comments prior to the June 14th Planning Commission meeting.
  • Order E.30.c.ii. pertaining to Westover Lane improvements – Applicant’s Engineer is addressing as requested.
  • Order E.30.d.ii pertaining to Fellowship Lane improvements – Applicant’s Engineer is addressing as requested.
  • Order B.17.,18. & 19. pertaining to stormwater management Best Management Practices-  The Township Engineer recommended the following:

    • A detailed plan identifying the proposed protection measures during site disturbance for each BMP proposed.
    • Water Quality Volumes calculated for all stormwater basins on the site.
    • Water Quality Volume calculated for each basin must be captured and treated to a level not less than 100 percent.
    • A detailed management plan for each BMP provided to ensure the longevity of the BMP.
    • Pre-treatment of the runoff provided prior to entering the recharge beds in the commercial/office area.  The method of pretreatment used shall be based on the ability to treat the pollutant characteristics of the runoff.

     

    Mr. Guarini reviewed the measures taken to promote stormwater recharge, special design details in the stormwater basins, Chester County Conservation District’s letter dated April 19, 2001 stating, “The District feels that the proposed basin layouts meet the recommendations of the PA Handbook of Best Management Practices for Developing Areas.”, and the “Water Quality Facilities” Plan for the commercial/office area of the project.  The Applicant’s consultant, Biohabitats, defined water quality volume for design recommendations for the basins as the first one inch of runoff from all impervious surfaces, which is assumed will carry the majority of pollutants; however, the Applicant argued that the standard (which is not a PA requirement) appears to be impractical from a cost and maintenance standpoint.  It is the Applicant’s opinion that the proposed plan meets the requirements of the order; however, the Township Engineer believes the basin modifications do not adequately address the water quality impacts created as a result of the proposed project.  This opinion is based on the goal set by Biohabitats.

     

    The applicant will submit an inlet detail utilizing grass and sand around the inlet (for a number of inlets noted in red on the Water Quality Facilities Plan in the commercial/office area) and additional water quality calculations from Biohabitats.

General comments pertaining to the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance were reviewed and will be addressed by the Applicant’s Engineer as requested.

 

Solicitor Greenwood will review the Homeowner’s Association documents when the submission is complete.  A draft letter to DEP regarding the Township’s response to the Hankin Tract Planning  Module was reviewed and approved for forwarding.  Once transferred onto Township letterhead, this response will be attached to Hankin’s response and forwarded to DEP.

 

Craig Kologie updated the Board on the following:

 

·        Matthews Meadows – Castle Valley Consultants conducted a site visit with the developer, Township and H.O.A. representatives; a revised final punchlist for the project will be generated.  Manager Heist will notify residents who have disturbed swale areas within the Township right-of-way.

·        Flowing Springs Road Bridge – Klein and Hoffman is preparing the submission to DEP, which is required due to the exceptional value designation of the Birchrun.

·        Wetherill Estate Water System/Improvement Dedication – Manager Heist met with the new project manager recently.  There has been no response from Southdown Properties; Solicitor Greenwood will generate correspondence at the appropriate time.

·        St. Stephens Greene Water System Operations Services – Castle Valley Consultants is collecting documentation requested by American Water Company; there has been no response from Philadelphia Suburban Water Company.

·        Houndstooth Lane and Houndstooth Circle Dedication – Outstanding issue regarding Lot 5 owners; Bob Kaiser submitted information Friday for Mr. Greenwood’s review.

·        St. Andrews Lane Realignment – Pending submission of documentation from the Cantrell family.

 

Proposed Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance amendments will be reviewed at the June 25th meeting; the proposed Grading Ordinance will not be considered, but incorporated into the building permit process by requiring grading plans and inspections.

 

Mr. Miller reviewed a proposed stormwater management plan, consisting of a retention pond and swales, to address the drainage issues on his property; Robert Wideman and Craig Kologie will visit the Davis Lane/Horseshoe Trail intersection to inspect the run-off problem on Horseshoe Trail and generate recommendations. 

The Board is considering an open space referendum on the November ballot. 

There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:30 a.m.